Our notable victories include obtaining the affirmance of a final judgment of paternity and its incorporated parenting plan, which allowed a father’s child to remain in Florida instead of moving to Idaho. See M.M. v. J.H., 251 So. 3d 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
And we have taken some of our cases to oral argument, including Venn v. Fowlkes, No. 1D17-003 (Fla. 1st DCA) (stalking injunction).
Our sample briefs include:
Answer brief in M.M. v. J.H., 251 So. 3d 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (affirming a final judgment of paternity and its incorporated parenting plan, which allowed a father’s child to remain in Florida instead of moving to Idaho);
Initial brief and reply brief in Akré-Deschamps v. Smith, No. 2D17-4837 (Fla. 2d DCA) (contempt regarding compliance with child pickup order);
Initial brief and reply / cross-answer brief in Judy v. Judy, No. 2D18-1566 (Fla. 2d DCA) (post-judgment modification of alimony);
Answer brief in Venn v. Fowlkes, No. 1D17-003 (Fla. 1st DCA) (stalking injunction);
